The envoy, Geir Pedersen, says Israel is violating a disengagement agreement from 1974 that, despite what Netanyahu says, remains in place.
The United Nations’ special envoy to Syria said Tuesday the Israeli military’s rapid move to seize Syrian territory following the Assad government’s collapse is a grave violation of a decades-old agreement that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claims is now dead.
“What we are seeing is a violation of the disengagement agreement from 1974, so we will obviously, with our colleagues in New York, follow this extremely closely in the hours and days ahead,” Geir Pedersen said at a media briefing in Geneva.
Hours earlier, Pedersen told Zeteo‘s Mehdi Hasan that “this needs to stop,” referring to Israel’s further encroachment on the occupied and illegally annexed Golan Heights.
“This is a very serious issue,” Pedersen said, rejecting Netanyahu’s assertion that the 1974 agreement is null. “Let’s not start playing with an extremely important part of the peace structure that has been in place.”
"The message to Israel is that this needs to stop, What we are seeing in the Golan is a violation of the 1974 agreement. This is a very serious issue."
The UN's Syria Special Envoy tells me on 'Mehdi Unfiltered' that Israel's unlawful actions in Syria need to stop. pic.twitter.com/G7jSWJ8oP0
— Mehdi Hasan (@mehdirhasan) December 9, 2024
Netanyahu, who took the stand for the first time Tuesday in his long-running corruption trial, made clear in the wake of Assad’s fall that he views developments in Syria as advantageous for Israel, writing on social media that “the collapse of the Syrian regime is a direct result of the severe blows with which we have struck Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran.”
The prime minister also thanked U.S. President-elect Donald Trump for “acceding to my request to recognize Israel’s sovereignty over the Golan Heights, in 2019,” adding that the occupied territory “will be an inseparable part of the state of Israel forever.”
The Washington Post reported late Monday that “within hours of rebels taking control of Syria’s capital, Israel moved to seize military posts in that country’s south, sending its troops across the border for the first time since the official end of the Yom Kippur War in 1974.”
“Israeli officials defended the move as limited in scope, aimed at preventing rebels or other local militias from using abandoned Syrian military equipment to target Israel or the Golan Heights, an area occupied by Israel after the 1967 Arab-Israeli war,” the Post added. “On Monday, more troops could be seen outside this Druze village adjacent to the border, preparing to cross.”
[The Post also reported that the U.S. is considering lifting the terrorist designation from the al-Qaeda off-shoot that took over Syria.]
The United States, Israel’s main ally and arms supplier, also defended the Israeli military’s actions, with a State Department spokesman telling reporters Monday that “every country, I think, would be worried about a possible vacuum that could be filled by terrorist organizations on its border, especially in volatile times, as we obviously are in right now in Syria.”
Watch StateSpox justify Israel’s invasion of Syria based on hypotheticals.@shauntandon: Israel has gone across the Golan Heights, the UN said it’s a violation, does the US agree
Miller: Every country would be worried about a possible vacuum that could be filled by terrorist… pic.twitter.com/AA7lNhfSt1
— Assal Rad (@AssalRad) December 9, 2024
On Tuesday, Israel denied reports that its tanks reached a point roughly 16 miles from the Syrian capital as it continued to bomb Syrian army bases.
“Regional security sources and officers within the now fallen Syrian army described Tuesday morning’s airstrikes as the heaviest yet, hitting military installations and airbases across Syria, destroying dozens of helicopters and jets, as well as Republican Guard assets in and around Damascus,” Reuters reported. The U.S. also bombed dozens of targets in Syria in the aftermath of Assad’s fall.
The governments of Iraq, Qatar, Iran, and Saudi Arabia have each denounced the Israeli military’s seizure of Syrian land, with Qatar’s foreign ministry slamming the move as “a dangerous development and a blatant attack on Syria’s sovereignty and unity as well as a flagrant violation of international law.”
“The policy of imposing a fait accompli pursued by the Israeli occupation, including its attempts to occupy Syrian territories, will lead the region to further violence and tension,” the Foreign Ministry warned.
Jake Johnson is a senior editor and staff writer for Common Dreams.
This article is from Common Dreams.
Views expressed in this article and may or may not reflect those of Consortium News.
Please Support CN’s
Winter Fund Drive!
Make a tax-deductible donation securely by credit card or check by clicking the red button:
these diplomats are irredeemable, pretending not to know or to understand how Isr*el would benefit from the fall of Syria. unless the Jihadi rebel groups decide to turn against Isr*el, and then it’s handed a hot potato indeed.
Nothing that israel does these days should surprise us. Violating international laws left and right and with IMPUNITY. Hasn’t anyone got the BALLS to stand up to the murderous Zionists? The more I hear about them the more I hate them.
The Israeli state says it is seizing Syrian territory in order to protect territory it previously seized. By that logic, it’ll never stop.
Blah, blah, blah, does anyone care anymore what the UN says ? Highly compromised organisation with no power to do anything other than talk. Everyone knows what’s going on, and no-one is interested in stopping it. The genocide will continue until greater Israel is realised. Time for the UN to call it a day.
An investigation which has as its prime focus identifying the facilitator(s)/source(s) of weaponry, vehicles, communications equipment, financial instruments for soldiers’ paychecks, uniforms, meals etc. seems the obvious choice of action for determining which individuals are guilty of initiating and carrying out illegal (state sponsored) war(s) of aggression.
The guilty individuals are identifiable by their failure to propose and/or demand the conducting of such a necessary and thorough legal investigation becomes initiated – as the most urgent first step toward peacefully ending/stopping the war crimes violence.